HOME » RESOURCES » Why Sunshine Profits Is Irrelevant – To Us

“Sunshine” in Poland – Why I Say No More (Mar 09, 2024)

visual

Freely following up on my public statements of disappointment mixed with disgust over Polish justice (Oct 14, 2023), the mockery it presents (Jul 22, 2023), and lack of interest in Sunshine Profits (Jul 22, 2023), here is more to the rich picture.

In 1868, British PM William Gladstone famously said, “Justice delayed is justice denied”, and Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. Expressed the same in his 1963 “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”: “Justice too long delayed is justice denied.”

After my first 21 points, a smaller part follows – essential for understanding this whole circus and where its protagonists come from – sociopolitical characteristics of Poland expressed by Polish and various foreign mass media, European Partliament, NGOs and European Court of Human Rights judicature.

I bet you’ll remember my prior parting words – “fuck them, fuck them all”.

Personal call first – don’t let petty tyrants bring you down, ever. There is plenty of people out there willing to stomp on you if you let them or after you stand up for yourself, who are willing to go to any lengths to make an example of you so that others never dare step out of line.
Live your own life playing your own game – you deserve better.
There is no shortage of more or less cunning suckers trying to comply their way out to the point of lying under oath, of those being happy being #2 in the pecking order for the rough work, and plenty of amorphous characters always looking the other way – I’ve seen them all in the last couple of years.
If you aren’t free inwardly, you can’t be free outwardly.
Enough with facades – live your own life, craft your own future.

Let’s go!

What does a kangaroo, a court and Poland have in common? Surprisingly a lot.

What good is my great legal team’s quality work done or evidence presented if it is de facto deemed irrelevant to and not even addressed in the defamation and harassment cases at hand? Still, I have filed briefest cassation possible.

It can also serve as notification of violations by respective Polish judges of Polish law governing defamation (Art. 212 §1 Penal Code), harassment and extortion violations (i.a. Art. 190a Penal Code), the provisions of Art. 427 §1 and 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Art. 438.2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (namely the provision of Art. 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) by making an arbitrary rather than free evaluation of evidence, together with facilitating human rights violation (namely dignity), enabling personal humiliation during court proceedings, promoting intolerance and mistreatment,
not to mention the merits of the case(s),
sanctioning deeds actually depriving me of confidence necessary for my profession, seeking to demean me in front of financial portals via publishing misleadingly fake and misrepresenting fake bio, sending out unfounded accusations of unethical conduct to unconcerned with the matter financial portals and instituting publication limitations against myself,
all essential in attempt to extract monetary benefits to which the opponent wasn’t entitled to, and pursuing which he reneged on in writing as part of effort to make me withdraw the private indictment for defamation, incl. by offering financial assistance.

This mockery of what is dignity as defined in Polish law, judicature and commitment to protect individual dignity, private and family life, and against arbitrary decisions so as to ensure a fair trial as protected by international treaties and European Court of Human Rights, of humiliation incl. during the proceedings by the opposing party, of processing evidence, is nothing short of stunning.
It is unnecessary at this stage that I point out which Articles of the European Convention on Human Rights and how, were violated.

Obviously though, this behavior that others beyond myself called defamation, harassment and extortion – this all flies in Polish courts, whether
– I file and duly conduct a criminal case for defamation,
– give testimony to Polish Police for harassment and extortion, or
– seek trial proceedings in the harassment and extortion matter I have also filed,
yet another Polish judge refused initiation of trial in this matter.

I can‘t and don‘t strive to hide my disgust over how justice in practice in Poland works – I’m wishing the Supreme Court courage and wisdom in protecting the spirit of the law unlike what I experienced in 1st and 2nd instance courts.

21 legal pearls follow.

1) how can the Court verdict claim that my dignity was not harmed and that I did not lose confidence necessary to perform own professional activities, when the opposite is objectively true as I presented e.g. the following and countless other written evidence:

I remember that note Sunshine Profits published about you when you were just a blog. It looks to me to be a nasty reprisal for you terminating cooperation with them, and I must say it initially raised in me some question marks about you that I had to get over. Reading that biography made me unsure about the whole situation with you – about your integrity, professional qualifications and quality of your work. I had to get to know your analyses better to dispel the bad impression that Sunshine Profits text about you created,”

I consider the characterizations attributed to Ms Kingsley in the fake biography of Sunshine Profits that has absolutely no relation whatsoever to the real Monica Kingsley, the financial advisor for stock markets that most of us know in the last 3 years that I have been with her.
If I was somebody else and didn’t know her well in advance, I admit that following reading the fake bio published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, I would be confused and misled by the unacceptable characterizations thereby included and I need to seek other professional advisors who may have been much less competitive than Ms Monica Kingsley, thus endangering or even losing my fortune.
Thank you so much Monica for being real and not fake advisor…”

After many years of following several financial analysts and their published articles. I have encountered only once such an egregious defamatory act against a publishing analyst.
For different reasons analysts, like many other professionals, move on to other institutions or become independent. Reasons could be, but aren’t limited to, higher compensation, broader exposure in better–known institutions, flex time to be closer to family, or Internal conflicts within institutions.
In my opinion. Sunshine Profits has hurt and damaged Monica Kingsley’s honor and reputation by publishing publicly on their website that they are not affiliated with her anymore; going to great lengths to paint her in negative light and strongly inferring e.g., that she has no experience in managing capital and going to the extreme of “not supporting ” her webpage.
In the financial world, many publishing analysts abstain from investing and managing capital for clients as to not create a biased opinion of the public to sway price action in one direction or another.
Why would Sunshine Profits mention that Kingsley does not have experience managing capital of others? It is irrelevant to the nature of her market analyst and trader profession. Why would Sunshine Profits mention and make readers doubt her “integrity, skills and ethics”? It made me doubt (and probably made hundreds, even thousands of readers doubt, and still does) her professional integrity and skills.
I sincerely hope justice is served for Monica Kingsley. For many months I doubted her because of what Sunshine Profits published about her; but I finally concluded that the demeaning bio was published to harm her.”

Here’s how I see it. After reading the fake bio (that’s not how a typical professional bio or notice about two parties parting ways as of day–month–year, looks like) published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, I began to doubt her qualifications and ethics as a financial analyst, and had to become very cautious about her work. When she published the article “Why Sunshine Profits Is Irrelevant – To Us”, I gained a more clearer understanding of what caused Sunshine Profits to post such a note raising question marks about her qualities and reputation on their website. The arguments and written evidence quotes Monica Kingsley presented, appear to me to be a case of extortion and harassment by Sunshine Profits.”

yes, I’m aware of the “bio” that Sunshine Profits published about yourself. In my view, it conveys the impression of you being incompetent and unethical to the point that they had to fire you.
It doesn’t talk your analyses or achievements that they surely had been presenting online together with your proper bio before you made the decision to leave – this fake bio attacks and broadly undermines you as a person, as a market analyst.
It raises unjustified doubts, as if you couldn’t be a good analyst just because you were not managing money for others. Also by saying that they don’t confirm your ethics, integrity and skills, they’re directly undermining these qualities – it’s all very damaging to your professional reputation.
I had to overcome more of such doubts they raised, and for quite some time I had been watching your articles and tweets carefully, before I could start trusting you.”

Following reading the fake bio published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, my initial reaction was what was going on with her? What had she done to deserve this unsettling disclaimer? Who had she harmed or what professional standards were breached. Should I look to subscribe elsewhere? The fake bio created an impression that she was unethical and unqualified for doing a good job as a market analyst. Thankfully I kept subscribing. Monika, you are the real deal and continue to provide the most informed market advise available. Thank you for not letting this slanderous attack detour you. You are the best.”

I’ll be brief and clear – f I had read the bio published by Sunshine Profits, before you offered me your commentary services, I would not have considered dealing with you. The picture they paint of you, would have been sufficient to warn me off. Since I found and accepted your services before reading the bio, I have found you to be insightful, and honest. The Sunshine bio does not describe the person I have come to know and respect”.

And the Court totally plain and simple ignores all of this evidence – as in it’s not being addressed at all, as in pretending that it doesn’t exist at all…
And they dare to claim with a straight face that my legal interests (honor, good name) were not harmed by the opponent’s actions and my appeal was purely polemical without anything substantially new? They rule that his actions didn’t lead to humiliation or expose me to loss of confidence necessary for my profession?
This can’t reasonably be an innocent mistake – so, how much more is there to this “omission”?

2) why has the opponent been allowed to file any motion at all when he deliberately missed the Court set (in Dec 2021) deadline of Jan 15, 2022, and only filed after the dealine on Mar 22, 2022?

3) has the Court condemned as manifestly untrue, baseless and malevolent accusation laid against me to suddenly in Mar 2022 pretend to have been humiliated by me taking this question in Jan 2021 while being aware of it since at least Feb 2021, which is also after the 1 year deadline set in Polish law for filing a defamation accusation?

I’m an English working class boy, now very Grey who follows the gold market like a hawk. I’m a longterm investor in PM’s sector and I have a largish position in PM miners (still in profit on most) but the last six month are playing havoc with my nerves. The best metaphor I have that describes my current situation is that I have a large bowl of golden soup with a big fly swimming in it and its name is Mr Radomski. His latest missive of 25 Jan outlines “where to now Gold” with a possible/probable decline of gold to between $1500 – $1600. I was rather hoping you might comment on his analysis and on how you see things developing over the coming months. I appreciate that you don’t give financial advice but his very bearish view is discomforting given the mad world we have around us and if Gold could crash to these levels in the current situation it begs the question why bother investing in PM’s.

which I answered entirely professionally:

Thank you for the question and for authorizing me to print it just the way it arrived. I‘ll answer solely from my personal perspective, and won‘t comment on personalities. I understand your frustration with gold being unable to really move, but as I tweeted already yesterday, this months–long correction is one to wear you out, not to scare you out.

Please check my Aug 07 article written for Sunshine Profits called S&P 500 Bulls Meet Non–Farm Payrolls, where in the section Calling out gold, I discuss the yellow metal‘s prospects. Compare that with my Monday‘s article Rosy February for S&P 500? Not So Fast to see how things turned out in the sector precisely.

It‘s with the same conviction that I say today again that this long consolidation in gold is in its latter stages. For now, gold is still rangebound, and I don‘t see a deflationary crash repeating that would bring it to said $1,500 – $1,600 levels. Definitely not. Looking at the real world around us, the Fed is becoming more active in expanding its balance sheet, new stimulus checks are coming (money flowing directly into the real economy, not sitting on commercial banks‘ balance sheets), and fiscal policy isn‘t tame exactly either. Inflation is making a steady return, and it‘s a question of time (think months) before it becomes broadly acknowledged.

In such an environment, a gold drop would be bought with both hands, thank you very much. Copper is rising, base metals aren‘t doing badly, and food price inflation is hot. We‘ve entered a decade of commodities, which would outperform paper assets. Who could tell me why gold would crash, even temporarily? What kind of mayhem in the bond markets would have to trigger that? Make no mistake, no single market moves in a vacuum.

Quite to the contrary, I look at gold and Bitcoin as the safe haven plays, with Bitcoin being the wild and volatile one. I am saying that Bitcoin has clearly decoupled, and once gold does the same, it means a vote of no confidence in the financial system. But this is not where we are currently. Gold is taking its cues from interest rates, real ones to be precise. The king of metals is also doing well during times of rising inflation.

Take the Fed keeping rates as low as can be for as long as eye can see (practical view of things), rising inflation bringing down opportunity costs of holding precious metals, and you have a great driver of higher gold prices. Given the economic policy steps, how likely is a deflationary shock now? Instead, look for the newly created money to keep entering the real economy, battling the high savings rate. Once you see the velocity of money to pick up, that would be the cherry on the cake. Gold unbound next.

For now though, arm yourself with patience, and don‘t let any gloomy forecasts not matching your real world experience of what‘s truly going on in this Brave New World, drive you to abandon your prior decision. Have the facts, the rationale changed? Constantly evaluate these, honestly and truthfully without getting scared. No, the answer is that the drivers are still in place, and will be gaining an upper hand increasingly more over time.

I see gold as breaking higher from this lengthy consolidation in spring, and as I‘ve explained in Monday‘s article, miners are set to outperform the metal early in this move when it comes, because they‘ve been beaten down quite sufficiently already.

Look also at the gold to silver ratio. Spikes in favor of gold are what I would look for in the next monetary crisis, or liquidity crunch. Currently, none is on the horizon.

As is pathetically obvious, there is no insult whatsoever according to prevailing social norms – even though the adversary claimed (only at the moment of filing his counter accusation after he failed to bribe me into withdrawing the private indictment – on other occasions his testimony was found untrustworthy by a different Polish court) to be “humiliated” by this question, even though he had tolerated without issues the following public assessments of his work and persona under his own articles or company profile over only a few recent years:

  1. Good analysis coupled with bad judgement” on Jan 20, 2021;
  1. Almost every analysis he made last year turned out to be wrong. In April he predicted $9 silver and $900 gold…lol” by Jan Buyle on Mar 05, 2021;
  1. word of advice …put your head between your thighs and kiss your sphincter good bye” by KEN_K on Mar 01, 2022;
  1. Radomski is my favorite contrarian indicator. Just do the opposite of what he says and you should do great” by Bernd Langer on Mar 06, 2022;
  1. this guy is such a joke” by Pawel Czosnek on Mar 06, 2022;
  1. Garbage analyst with worst track record. He would be bankrupt if he actually traded” by Anasi Lindfors on Mar 11, 2022;
  1. you never give up, prezelbovsky, do you?” by Lawrenti Berija on Mar 12, 2022;
  1. The truth is he’s being paid to provide a narrative. He’s a bought man. He doesn’t care about his reputation. Nor all the poor smucks that listen to his Diarrhea spewing from his pervibial pie hole” by KEN_K on Mar 12, 2022;
  1. useless guy,hh” by Yosef Aldwairi on Mar 22, 2022;
  1. why do you write so much ? Powell is peeing in his pants if he continues to be hawhish. you only know economics by their books, but you obviously fail to understand the human dynamics” by TanMeng on May 05, 2022;
  1. narcissism is often accompanied by ignorance and stupidity” by TanMeng on May 05, 2022;
  1. I don’t get it either. he could easily make his point using 30% of the words he does. I think it’s more of look into his narcissism than anything else” by Tom Sc on May 05, 2022;
  1. Apparently your memory is short as well, as last time inflation was this high (1970s) gold and silver moved up along with interest rates. You are bankster shill and a joke” by Juan De Facto on May 06, 2022;
  1. This guy need to take a medicine pill or go to a hospital to check his mental. Absolutely nonsense” by Sunghoon Shawn Hwang on May 12, 2022;
  1. Thanks for you weekly rubbish anyway” by „falec” on Jun 16, 2022;
  1. Fraud” by Jack O. on Nov 06, 2022;
  1. […] he’s a uni–directional loser” by Dwain Hobbs on Mar 03, 2023;
  1. he’s so fundamentally flawed that it’s laughable. for one, he needs to research the quantity theory of money and note that there is 3x the m2 in circulation that there was in 2008, he is comparing apples to oranges looking at technical from 15 years ago that has nothing to do with today” by Tom Scheuermann on May 04, 2023;
  1. This guy is always pessimistic for gold. Never saw any positive comments on gold. Also, nwever saw his self–criticism on his wrong analysis and predictions. Don’t understand he has been survived in this market. Please stop writing any more comments and analysis” by Jaeyoo Kim on May 04, 2023;
  1. Always fun reading analysis of the worst Investing analyst. He predicted $900 gold and $9 silver …an then they went up to $2000 and $30. What a joker…” by Jan Buyle on Jun 16, 2023;
  1. You have no analysis only bias. Shame on you, if you know what that is” by Iancu Jianu on Jul 24, 2023;
  1. exactly. just bias. which is why is so dangerous. he has lead investors into the wood chipper and he will do it again” by Tom Scheuermann on Jul 24, 2023;
  1. one word describes your market analysis. “Gaslighting”. Don’t wait to buy gold, buy gold and wait” by Mitch Hoch on Jul 18, 2023;
  1. good call. yes he is gas lighting. he talks in certainties and ignores all his last mistakes. narcissistic. this guy has been so wrong for so long and yet would have no idea of that by reading his articles” by Tom Scheuermann on Jul 18, 2023;

Why hasn’t the Court ruled it was misled by this manifestly untrue accusation?

4) Have I played any of the psychological assessments in my filings so as to demean the opponent as narcisstic, arrogant, or describing the hostile work environment as sociopathic? No.

5) But did the Court reprimand him (yes, him – when I filed a complaint against his legal counsel for unacceptable conduct violating basic human dignity with the Bar Association in Gdańsk, Poland, his counsel pointed her finger at him as the requesting source of the following) for making unsubstantiated personality claims
after meeting me only on two occassions (May 2019 and Mar 2020) and never raising any such assertions with myself even online,
claiming without any credible written evidence in Mar 2022 “that I was allegedly of unstable mental health during 2020, of suicidal tendencies, low self–esteem, lack of self–confidence, mood swings, general oversensitivity or interfered with my private life”, only to finally mislead the Court by claiming “proneness to verbal aggression”, so as to paint me in a negative light at any cost.
Yet the Court entertains such drivel without castigating him? Is it primitive enough to influence determining culpability for defamation? What kind of laughing stock have legal profession standards become in Poland? How is this not a breach of dignity and European values facilitated by the very institution that is supposed to protect them?
How can also the Bar Association of Gdańsk, Poland, sanction such practices that only raise eyebrows about Poland abroad?

6) Or the Court has the temerity to rule that as a non–profit blog offering no paid products or services, generating zero income and refusing all donations, that I had been engaged in a business in 2021? Without backing it with any evidence at all?
What about the missing profit motive?
The fact that after the no compete clause expired, I sought to enter into cooperation with other entities, is also overlooked.
Would some civil law kangaroo court also make shit on the fly like this so as to sentence me?
Given the insistence with which this false conclusion is frequently being presented, I have come to the conclusion that they would do it, without respecting tax law definitions or what traits distinguish a business from a non–profit blog.

7) Or when when I fielded a fair cooperation proposal early Sep 2020 (days before my opponent removed me as Stock Trading Alerts author, refusing to say so clearly to clients) about wanting to launch own site for greater visibility and explicitly ruling out own sales channels, the Court rules that this would be a competitive business even if it would generate zero income and all sales would go through Sunshine Profits?
Where does this obsession with assigning profit motive or business status to non–existent circumstances, or alleging willingness to compete with the opponent while inside of his own company come from?

8) How can accusing me of unethical conduct over emails to portals only to acknowledge he has no claims against myself and resigning from pursuing them, how can this be ruled as something I in effect brought upon myself by having civil law issues arising out of contracts closed with the opponent when it was him who was baselessly harassing me with his “creative” claims?
How can it be ruled that after I could finally leave Sunshine Profits, the opponent had any right to involve many financial portals in his own civil affairs by laying false accusations against myself?
The Court in effect is ruling that writing free independent financial analyses with any substantive content, would be a violation of no–compete clause as it again ascribed me a business status in 2021 when none actually existed?
Let me tell you that in order to be a business, you have to both commence business activities as an entrepreneur, and have a product or service that you sell, i.e. there must direct monetary consideration in return for specific items – and neither of these happened.
Further, portals never pay their contributors for non–exclusive content, so there no logical justification in spreading unfounded accusations of unethical conduct consisting in no–compete clause violation to them – unless you of course want to trample on my civil rights as much as you can.
Why is the Court itself in effect interfering with freedom of speech and allowing the opponent to transgress my civil rights when I have not raised with portals similar non–confirmations of ethics and skills (but the Court twists and ignores actual impact of opponent’s actions) in the precisely same way?
What kind of satire running against legal definitions and common sense keeps the Court producing in its verdicts?

9) How can the Court rule publishing a fake bio wildly misrepresenting reality of my successful performance and countless recognition of skills, achievements and ethics awarded incl. solid bio, being a neutral, not damaging message of non–support and dissociation from my future activities so that no one can mistake me for being part of Sunshine Profits in 2021, even though I couldn’t have been clearer about finally leaving them and returning to the public in Jan 2021?
I never sought their endorsement, and no client was unclear about my independent status so as to request they publish anything about me.

Yet it’s online for over 3 years since leaving them when everyone is clear I don’t want to be harassed or have anything to do with Sunshine Profits, with the Court ridiculously finding so justified, because someone hypothetically could be mistaken about my truly independent status when I had blocked this den of malevolent duplicity wherever I could?

So much for getting opponent’s written assurance in Oct 2020 that circumstances of my departure and my professional results, would never be distorted. Yeah, thanks for all the lies and for keeping yet another promise…

And the Court has no explanation for why the opponent changed the fake bio back into the original decent one he used when living off my success, and why he did so when he felt confident he would get me back into Sunshine Profits in mid 2021? His games with fake bio publication on and off depending either on feeling a chance to extract some profit from myself or avoiding judgement by inducing me to refrain from pursuing further legal moves, are clear proof to me of him being aware both of its humiliating impact and also of being interested to maintain and profit from cooperation – why is this also being denied?

By the way, Mr Rejczak used to write Stock Trading Alerts for years before being stopped in summer 2019, making the way for myself to take over as of Feb 2020 after being thoroughly tested for market calls profitability beating S&P 500 – and after my departure in Sep 2020 through terminating cooperation, two more guys (Mr Levy and Mr Zorabedian) were running this publication, each lasting no more than a couple of months – dropping clear hints just how “successful” those replacements were in doing quality work compared to myself – and Sunshine Profits ended back with Mr Rejczak who was not a primary pick but resurrected to the role in Aug 2021.
Can’t just make it up, can you.

As a side note, the Court in one breath confirmed that the opponent expressed multiple times his appreciation for my knowledge and skills, as well as appreciation for contributions made to the development of the company – he did so before, during and after the cooperation.

The Court also completely ignores the opponent stating in Oct 2020 that my bio would no longer be needed after my departure and that the facts about myself and my work would never be distorted – they obviously don’t mind:

“As for the materials about you and your work that have been published, they will never be distorted, and will even probably be removed at some point. Some previously – such as the results page – are no longer available on the website. Other authors will start it from scratch, based on standard measurements of results. Some probably later – your bio will no longer be needed.”

Can you make up better crap than “it’s dealing with the future, not with the past” instead of the Court duly examining the actual defamatory impact it has given evidence presented?
The Court is acting as if it were part of the opponent’s defence – such creative and brand new excuses are served as excuse of the long campaign smearing and intimidating me, it’s just incredible this impression.

10) How can the Court take seriously allegedly genuine consumer feedback when I first asserted I don’t believe its authenticity and consider it originating inside Sunshine Profits thanks to either elaborate, or cunning or primitive characterics of these three pieces corresponding to actual ex–coworker characters, and second, Sunshine Profits ever since forcing me under duress and against the contractual stipulations back into Stock Trading Alerts author role (end of Sep 2020) where they themselves were suddenly checking every single word I wrote to rule out presence of potential invitations to readers to directly connect with myself after my decision to terminate cooperation was delivered to the opponent?
This also means they were both actually and as per the contract responsible for everything published under my name.
How could have the opponent used this flimsy and false reasoning of termination of cooperation while the clock to my exit via contractual notice period expiring, was ticking mercilessly? Some reason had to be invented after this reinstation and removal charade so as to try to stem the exodus of clients that I all brought to the company.
Was this exercise necessary to try to discredit me, whom he perceived as a within weeks appearing competitor, and whom his legal counsel was pestering without a single proof of me engaging in actual competitive activities in Dec 2020?
Why did he ignore consistently negative feedback to his own writings over the years, yet tried to find non–market related faults with me in such a spasmodic way?
Yet the Court willfully overlooks that all.

11) talking allegedly ethical work environment, how come when I proved it in writing as one damaging both directly and indirectly client interests, how is it possible zero attention has been paid to my mid Sep 2020 Code of Ethics complaint with the opponent for these very acts?
Moreover, I never got a response to the Code of Ethics complaint, even though requesting it in writing.

And sure the opponent didn’t retaliate against me after I terminated cooperation via making unauthorized reductions in my salary without basis in law, for which he was sentenced by a civil law court – no, that’s impossible he must be a saint.

12) how is it possible that the Court rules I was a difficult coworker based on Dec 2022 testimonies when none of these ex–coworkers ever brought anything up with me (to the contrary, one actually claimed I did nothing wrong and disagreed with the treatment of mine by the opponent), and when discriminatory practices were instituted against myself, consisting in isolating me from the rest of the coworkers after I terminated cooperation in Sep 2020, and the opponent sent me via his legal counsel demand to refrain from competitive activities even before the cooperation contract expired and while I was duly fulfilling my duties?
Or what about taking at face value opponent’s claim that when I invite clients of my publication to field me questions via Sunshine Profits support or at investing.com forum under my articles (there was no possibility to comment under my articles at Sunhine Profits) that this is initiation of client exodus out of Sunshine Profits even if I have no website or own place where these people would wait months for me? What kind of control freak logic is this?
Or that I allegedly demanded increased attention when in reality all I was after was doing own high quality work while being left alone and relieved from all the BS work including having to read analyses from almost the whole company? Is it any wonder that since summer 2020 the only place of work I was looking forward for, was the investing.com forum where I could freely talk markets with the audience?
Sure if you don’t tolerate abuses of power against you, then that must make you a difficult coworker… for the one trying to make the most out of you. How about stating instead clearly that the work environment was hostile if not toxic – and based on fear and controlling?
What is this effort to whitewash manifestly duplicitous behavior towards myself while I cooperated more than in good faith with the opponent while he kept treating me as a competitor and milk cow?

13) how can the Court rule for credibility of witnesses and against unhealthy work environment when one of the ex–coworkers wrote:

I am not happy with the way it is being handled either. Unless the goal is a culture of fear. I am sorry. that this is happening to you. Don’t worry. i’ll be next.
“My opinion: it’s not right, you haven’t done anything wrong to deserve it.”
“I feel as you, humiliated and alienated.”

Wanted to tell you that I feel a little used by SP, that’s all.”
“This job is no longer enjoyable for me.”
“the environment for me is not good, at all.”
” I am probably leaving.”
„I called him, of course he didn’t answer. I know he hides behind his keyboard. My wife says to quit and we’ll manage fine, I can be a house hubby allowing her to work more.“
„I rely on him for food and strict orders regarding you I’m going to tell him today that I think he hadled it badly.”
“I bet you don’t miss sending a message to PR and sitting and waiting for a reply, especially when usually “ok” would be more than one …. I wish I had thicker skin and wasn’t such a sensitive person…. Actually I will ask him. if he could be nicer to me”
„I haven’t made the absolute decision to leave. I can swallow my pride – but let’s face the truth, there is no gold at the end of the SP Rainbow , for “us”, the subservient. Can I ask you, should I quit – or just suck it up and play his game?”
„Either is zero income in Poland.”
„Please understand my silence has been nothing short of self preservation, nothing more nothing less.”

Please tell me , if you will, what you would do if you were me. I really value your opinion, dearly. So sorry I’ve been silent – as you can see it was for not.”

following the opponent’s “management techniques” only to falsely testify that the work environment and atmosphere was good?

What would you think if you received the below in Jan 2021?

was just signing the paperwork, when I got this thought that maybe I should verify this instead of just assuming that your typing speed improved significantly and you’re now typing without looking at the keyboard – so that we can work at full capacity going forward.

On April 24 you sent me a screenshot, where you had 31 WPM. The above shows that you haven’t improved at all. At least not more than if you haven’t done the course at all, and you just continued to type in the “regular” way.
That’s disappointing.
The time that you dedicated to it, wasn’t enough to make you write without looking at the keyboard.

You spent that time inefficiently, which means that part of the payment was not spent as it was supposed to (thus, it was partially wasted). The worst part is that I explained that to you that this would be the worst case outcome, and still, here we are.
We have just hired your assistant – the company is paying so that you can spend your time more effectively.

Nobody likes being ignored or having to remind people about things – especially more than once, but I don’t like it particularly – it tells me that I have to either dedicate more time for verifying things, or perhaps dedicate someone else to verify it. This is not encouraging.

Consequently, we will postpone the adjustment in your agreement until you catch up with the latter. Once you manage to regularly update your writing speed (three consecutive 1–minute tests with at least 45 WPM in each case), we’ll adjust the agreement. IF you manage to do that before the end of January, I will send you the agreement signed and the next payment will already be 2000 pln higher than it was in 2019. If not, then the payout for January will be as in 2019. The same in Feb and so on – until you catch up with the previous year’s fast typing task. I’m not sending it now, as it is not known when you’ll catch up.”

Would you treat a disadvantaged human being, supposedly in a management position, like this? Where is the respect for this Jewish guy who seemed to want to break some kind shackles? 2,000 Polish zloty is $500 mind you.

This guy had a glimmer of conscience striking him in autumn 2020 following the forced separation of mine from the rest of coworkers – I’m glad I never asked for or used his help – masks always fall off eventually, and people return where they belong:

“I hope you start your own blog, you’ll do great once you have your freedom… I’ll help you any way I can Monica”

Or the other ex–coworker witness claiming I never complained to Sunshine Profits about the false allegations being spread about myself, when I did so in writing? Or accusing me of publishing the opponent’s premium gold and silver market calls which though had been earlier freely published online and ridiculed by the retail trading audience?
This allegedly reliable witness had also engaged together with the opponent in requesting after I terminated cooperation in Sep 2020 (against the Czech Rep. law violating workplace privacy, of which he was informed), installation of screenshot grabbing software so as to monitor my every move?
And the Court doesn’t bat an eyelid and punish perjury by either of the two?
Why aren’t these two guys prosecuted?

Hilariously, the Court finds that humiliating a ex–coworker e.g. for poor typing speed, all of the above and more, that these actions don’t exceed limits accepted in average workplaces. Bravo.

There is a concept called ‘normalization of deviance’, identified by NASA, in which members of an organization or society repeatedly engage in deviant behavior without catastrophic consequences, which is resultantly habituating the members of the organization or society to the deviant behavior and thus normalizing it.

I highly recommend Étienne de la Boétie (“The Politics Of Obedience The Discourse Of Voluntary Servitude”) for anyone who ever was in similar circumstances.

There can be no friendship where there is cruelty, where there is disloyalty, where there is injustice. And in places where the wicked gather there is conspiracy only, not companionship: these have no affection for one another; fear alone holds them together; they are not friends, they are merely accomplices.”

It is incredible how as soon as a people become subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and willingly that one is led to say that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement.”

Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.”

14) how is it possible that the opponent’s reputation generating such a wealth of disparaging assessments over a much longer period of time (dating back over a decade as per Dwain Hobbs above), hasn’t led to raising questions of larger ethical issues written about publicly or to myself.
What a true saying “watch what they do, not what they say” – how come such an “analytical profitability” with so many raised questions doesn’t amaze anyone as to how is it possible to stay in business at all with such track record?
Don’t his permabearishly perceived analyses create consistently nice exit liquidity?
My point is that the Court should have looked into these possibilities, yet it was instead nonchalantly overlooked where the scattered facts might be leading.
Why did he not terminate himself from authorship position following such a deluge of disdain and contempt others expressed?

15) How can the opponent be deliberately mixing up financial analysis quality with the alleged necessity of sweating it out for someone in asset management – wasn’t he himself due to quality of his market calls forced to mothball his very own hedge fund?
Why is the Court disregarding that he offered me as part of 2021 reconciliation negotiations to carry that over and start afresh under my own name?
Of course the Court ignores this, and in the absence of anyone being confused as to the opponent in 2020–21 actually not offering asset management services, has to be pointing out that no asset management in Sunshine Profits was done by myself – when no one suspected otherwise?

16) How come the opponent can even request that I delete all mentions of Sunshine Profits by whoever said them, even though these do not constitute any insult – in blatant violation of free speech?

17) how is it possible that the opponent filed in bad faith a DMCA takedown notice against my site a few short weeks after my launch, ignoring fair use regime that my blog enjoyed when displaying select logos, and against 512(f) of the DMCA Act – not in his name, but having inserted himself between another portal as its copyright representative – how is it possible this isn’t part of a lengthy campaign of creating nuisance, harassing and intimidating me?

18) How come that the below grotesque extortion attempt running afoul of my written request in the last days of “cooperation” (Dec 2020) not to be harassed, have my civil liberties or private life interfered with, is ignored by Polish courts, Prosecutor’s Office and Police? He is even boasting that he is following me up closely.
And that wasn’t the only instance when I wasn’t left alone even though I requested no further interference with my life. And then the below text via registered letter is sent to me early Mar 2021 – how, just how the below is ruled as not harassing or extortionist – does it really meet prevailing social conduct standards in Poland?
I doubt so…

I guess that your actions created a much bigger threat for yourself than for me or my company.
I consulted this upcoming legal case (agreements, plus all the evidence we secured) with a second legal counsel, and they also told me I have north of 90% probability of winning it.
I have archives of practically everything that you have done online in the recent weeks and it all confirms claim that we’re making in the official document. I have archives of your hostile (they are hostile in the opinion of other people from the SP Team, both legal counsels’, and my own) messages.
This all means that either the court would issue a warrant of payment right away, or after a relatively short trial. With this warrant, I would go the bailiff (a.k.a. reposession agent), who would then freeze your bank & brokerage accounts, notify your landlord that all payments have to go toward the warrant and not to the landlord directly, and so on. We’re both in the EU, so this would be executed effectively (I checked). I’d present the court order to all third parties imaginable where it would be legal to do so (including news portals), who would then in all likelihood all stop publishing your analyses. Your “newsletter writer” career would be over, and you would have much bigger problem, because whatever company you would then work for, would also be notified by the bailiff and you’d not be able to earn much, if anything at all.
Knowing your emotional side, I’m afraid that this could – how to say it nicely – “negatively affect your willingness not only to pursue the newsletter writer path, but all other paths as well”.
You might be surprised by what I’m about to write.
I would require you to send us 30% of your gross (!) income (without tiers, linear scale). It’s “gross”, not “net”, because this means I won’t need to verify anything regarding your cost structure.
I’d require you to remove anything that’s Sunshine Profits’ related on your website / articles / comments etc. – that could be viewed as something negative (be that quote, comment or testimonial). I would allow you to use the profitability statistics – the chart from SP with logotype that confirms the validity of the data.
Additionally, I’d require you to include at least two backlinks to the dictionary / explanation section on our website(s) per week.
On my end, I would remove your bio from our page (which we have there legally – I triple checked), and I’d ask all portals to resume your publications.
Just a reminder nonetheless – we’re not negotiating. If you don’t want the agreement on these terms (I’m not open to negotiations, the above is the most that I’m willing to provide you with), and prefer to go the legal way, we can do so. In fact, I already paid for preparation of the court documents – but it doesn’t mean that I have to use them. Please send me a one–sentence email with how you’d like to proceed. Then, we’ll either sign a new revenue–sharing agreement (I’d send you the document with the above–mentioned details), or we’ll take this to court.”

How can he be even offering these goods as bargaining chips? He can, the same Jewish guy wrote me the below in early Feb 2021 – I just don’t get what should I be apologizing for, for picking faults with excessively bearish gold market analyses, or for the fact that I left Sunshine Profits and want to live happily in peace?

“My best advice is to write him a sincere apology letter. It’s not about being right, it’s about being smart. Be sincere, if you do that in a sincere way I think he might reduce your limitations.”

And the Court evades pronouncing that publication limitations and smearing me had happened, and select portals carried it out against myself? Who are the judges ridiculing?

19) How come the Court ignores addressing the opponent’s complaint alleging defamation, which though had been actually backed by written evidence I presented?
It is all also in line with life experience and rules of logic – and wasn’t disproved with written evidence at all.

“a long list of serious wrongdoings that have constituted illegal demands, misled and even hurt the audience, … It’ll take time, but I expect justice to be served – taking so long after I proudly made the great mid–Sep 2020 decision, and terminated cooperation. Dissociating as much and as fast as I realistically could from irreformable settings since late Sep 2020 already, but still delivering to the people as best I could in spite of imposed crippled means of service provision. Whoever was living off my success, repeatedly speaking about myself with high professional esteem, won’t be spreading insinuative slanders and sour grape allegations once the dollars I had been generating were slated to stop flowing their way through my decision to exit.”

20) Even though the opponent presented the fact that CFA Institute didn’t commence disciplinary proceedings with him till Dec 2022, that can’t be construed as an evaluation confirming ethics of his actions.
No, not even my 2023 notifications to the CFA Institute failing to elicit manifestly explicit action by said body in defence of its ethical standards, can’t serve as such “proof” – it is only saying what CFA Institute acceptable standards regrettably are.

21) My personal evaluative statement is that my experience with the defendant has been a nightmare, a place you just can’t leave without being pursued.

Is it a coincidence that I’m blacklisted at a number of key portals since declaring independence? No.
Is it a coincidence that no client ever criticized my professional ways or questioned my ethics? No.
Is it a coincidence that I terminated cooperation in Sep 2020, and not the other way round? No.
Is it a coincidence that I didn’t want to be connected with Sunshine Profits anyhow since Sep 2020? No.

Does it matter whether you prove lies and deal with ad hominem allegations? No.
Does it matter whether you refute every abstract statement and red herring? No.
Does it matter whether witnesses testify under oath in contradiction of written evidence? No.
Does it matter whether subscribers have been misled and harmed? No.
Does it matter whether demonstration of power inside the company came above client interests? No.
Does it matter whether management techniques involve humiliation? No.
Does it matter whether I was forced to return to authoring analyses under duress? No.
Does it matter whether my salary was cut without basis in law after I terminated cooperation? No.
Does it matter whether “misrepresentations of reality” about myself were and are being spread around? No.
Does it matter whether I was deprived of professional opportunities? No.
Does it matter whether my site growth was cut probably in half? No.

Yes, Poland is a republic, and it would be most fitting if bananas grew there too.
Is it possible to come to any other conclusion that this proceess of seeking justice in Poland is helplessly flawed if not biased?

Which foreigner with two brain cells left would think Polish legal system offers protection against unscrupulous locals they decide to leave?
Who wants to be exposed to Polish jurisdiction choosing sophistry?
Who wants some two–tier justice? Calls for a
decent solution are in vain

My purpose is to correct deeply wrong actions of Polish judiciary – I have zero interest in spending a single second on Mr Radomski or to be ever accosted by him, his associates, or see either in my or my closests’ vicinity.

Conduct of Polish judiciary and his defence team is a stain not only on the image of Poland, but on the legal profession itself.

I’m done with Poland’s institutions and similar.

The quest for justice 2021–2023 cost me in the region of roughly $15–20,000 for legal representation, sworn translations and travels with accommodation for Court and Police hearings, bringing immense personal stress affecting quality of life as much as the opponent’s deeds themselves – note also the indirect costs of pursuing justice (time of my legal work that I could have devoted to partners or clients), and finally there is the unrealized potential in professional opportunities missed due to the adversary’s actions – and I request that the Supreme Court in light of my Oct 13, 2023 statement corrects the painfully obvious wrongs, and that it serves as force for good and protection of human rights and personal dignity.

I move for the verdict acquitting the accused Przemyslaw Radomski of defamation and in effect harassment / extortion to be annuled / cancelled, and appropriately amended / the case returned to the Apellate Court for this purpose.

I again highlight prior plea for help in securing elementary personal justice with the ruling democratic coalition of Poland.

I wish the new representation of Poland good luck in clearing the Augean stables inherited and ingrained in its structures.
Good luck in correcting blatant excesses of prior political era and in application of the best European values.

The status quo of verdicts and this experience of mine is an affront to all decent Polish citizens that individually uphold the reputation of Poland.

It must be painfully obvious that since Poland didn’t find Mr Radomski having commited defamation, harassment or extortion, then Mr Radomski must be among the most ethical persons on Earth – and this examination exercise and free press reporting only highlights prevailing state of standards of legal profession sanctioned by the Bar Association of Gdańsk, Poland, prevailing norms of social coexistence, interpretation of law, commitments to European values, and procedural code observance by Polish courts.

I nominate Mr Radomski to be awarded the title “CFA of the month” in recognition of best ever representation of CFA charterholder values. Truly living them.

I nominate Sunshine Profits work collective standards to be recognized as the best Poland has to offer.

This must also represent a successful case study of European Regional Development Fund financing (2007–2013) with over 475,000 PLN grant (that’s over $117K) – EU money used for creation of such a workplace of highest standards.

I nominate Mr Radomski’s legal counsel and the Bar Association of Gdansk to be recognized for extraordinary contributions to protection of human dignity, tolerance and non–incitement of mistreatment and hatred.

I call on the judges issuing verdicts in question (M. P.–L., M. C., and G. D.) to be distinguished for exemplary following of the letter and spirit of Polish law and for outstanding contributions to defining what human dignity is, and I highlight my plight e.g. to the new Prime Minister and the Ministry of Justice.

I know, this is a revolutionary idea – just imagine how refreshing it would be if these legal professionals for a change provided services to clients willing to pay for such acumen. Living without a cushioned job that they essentially can’t be removed from, would make them appreciate honor and dignity.
If I did such a job, I wouldn’t dare ask any money for it – or anyhow it’s being made.
Karma gets everyone.

Now, some cultural and political background that allows better understanding where these actors are coming from.

(1)
My experience belongs among countless instances demonstrating, quoting “the fatal breakdown of the rule of law in Poland, which has occurred in the last eight years of PiS party rule” covered by mass media abroad (Seznam, Czech Rep.).
It’s not every day when ex Minister of Justice Mariusz Kamiński and his deputy Maciej Wąsik (both for PiS party) end up arrested in President Duda’s residency for deliberately having avoided serving the two–year prison sentence to which they were sentenced by the Warsaw District Court for abuse of power before Christmas 2023.

(2)
Compromising the independence of Polish judiciary after PiS assumed rule, has been covered not just west or south of Poland, but also east (Kyiv Independent, Ukraine), quoting.
“Most of the damage PiS has caused to Polish institutions also remains. For example, when the party came to power in 2015, it combined the offices of prosecutor–general and minister of justice, and handed that role to Zbigniew Ziobro, a far–right partisan who immediately began “reforming” the courts. The National Council of the Judiciary, which nominates judges, was duly purged and then stacked with PiS cronies. Soon enough, the PiS government had illegally politicized and seized control of the Constitutional Court, followed eventually by the Supreme Court.
As a result, Poland now has two parallel legal orders, only one of which is constitutional and legitimate. Across the judiciary, there are more than 2,000 PiS–aligned “neo–judges” who were appointed by the refashioned Council. Because Ziobro drew from this compromised pool when selecting directors of the common courts, thousands of verdicts can now be challenged.”

(3)
Another quote describing realities on the Polish ground, this time from Gazeta Wyborcza’s Bartosz T. Wieliński.
“We stood bravely on the barricades. We defended the rule of law and the independent courts against PiS. We demonstrated in defence of women’s rights and minority rights. We stood firmly behind the free media and protested loudly when PiS was preparing to take Poland out of the European Union. However, PiS was like a steamroller that was accelerating all the time. And we were constantly retreating from position to position. PiS attacked us, dehumanized us and denied us the right to be Poles. It wasn’t concerned about the victims – the murdered mayor of Gdańsk, Paweł Adamowicz, the hounded Mikołaj Filiks, pregnant women who died because abortion was completely delegalized in Poland by the barbaric verdict of the PiS judges. I wondered with horror when the last boundary line separating Poland from transformation into a dictatorship would be crossed.

The state became the ruling party’s property, while the employees of the institutions became its servants and the police and army became its bodyguards. Journalists in our country had to defend the independence of their editorial offices, which the authorities delighted in oppressing. Increasingly fewer of them were being left.
I wonder where Poland, the fifth largest country of the European Union, would have been today had it not been for these lousy eight years…”

(4)
Poland has for long demonized gender equality, enabling mistreatment of women and violence against them – politicizing suppression of elementary civil rights as defence of alleged traditional values. What traditional values, I ask?
“Women’s rights activists and organizations in Poland remain under attack. Since coming to power in 2015, the PiS government has targeted women’s rights groups through raids and denial of funding, often with little warning and no clear rationale. PiS leaders, politicians, and church–backed groups have publicly smeared women’s rights organizations, mischaracterizing their work as dangerous to families and traditional values. Government agencies have dragged state employees who support women’s rights protests or collaborate with women’s rights groups before disciplinary hearings and threatened their jobs. High–level PiS leaders and civil servants have championed retrogressive laws and policies, sought to reinforce traditional gender roles, disparaged feminism, and publicly discouraged efforts to combat violence against women.
The government and the Catholic Church in Poland have been outspoken in censuring the concepts of “gender” and “genderism” and labeling promotion of equality as “gender ideology,” which they demonize as driving hypersexuality, homosexuality, feminism, transgenderism, and an assault on traditional ideas of marriage and family. The anti–gender rhetoric serves two purposes: it unites people around a concept of ‘traditional values’ in opposition to a perceived foreign threat and it demonizes women’s rights activists and individuals who do not conform to sexual and gender norms. Under the PiS government, the anti–gender crusade has gained traction, with right–wing activists and conservative politicians using it to galvanize support for measures that curb reproductive rights, undermine initiatives to address violence against women, hinder sexual and reproductive health education, and smear women’s rights and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights activists. In speeches and in the media, government leaders, politicians, and “anti–gender” activists propagate extremist misinformation vilifying women’s rights groups and associating them with a deterioration in “morality.”

The government’s open disdain of women’s rights and failure to counter misinformation campaigns fosters a climate of fear for women human rights defenders. Activists said it also deters women and girls from seeking help, including survivors of violence.”

(5)
It can be correctly said that one recognizes the culture based on how it treats its vulnerable ones, and that means women and various other minorities – perfectly illustrating broad–based failures to generally protect anyone’s basic human dignity.
This is about equal treatment before law, bias–free and pursuing the letter and spirit of the law – not about preferential treatment or entitled groupthink.
Let’s quote some of the Nov 2022 findings of the FEMM committee of European Parliament.
“Neither rape nor the other sexual offences have a consent–based, but a force–based definition. Therefore the criteria holds a high threshold which does not cover all realities women may face.

The official numbers of cases of gender based violence can only be seen as an indicator. Unlike with any other offense, cases of gender based violence happen, sometimes without being reported, and only a very small number of those reported lead to a conviction. One has to differentiate between the official statistics, the reported violence, the disclosed violence and the actual prevalence and incidence of violence.

19% of women have experienced physical and/or sexual violence by current and/or previous partner or by any other person since the age of 15. However, this has to be seen in perspective: in majority of the cases of the respondents in Poland the violence resulted in injuries, so were the more serious incidents. It found that 9% of women in Poland have been stalked and 32% of women experienced sexual harassment. The survey also found a correlation between Polish women’s reluctance to report cases of domestic violence and a lack of faith in the criminal justice system as well as a fear of victims not being believed.

the hate campaign against the LGBTI community in Poland, which started in October 2018, resulted in LGBTI people becoming a dominant issue during 2020 presidential elections, in which President Duda degraded and scapegoated the LGBTI community on his way to election victory.
This included claims that LGBT people were “not people but ideology” and other attempts at dehumanisation and incitement of hate and fear. Hate speech by the central government remained a serious issue. The Ministry of Justice sponsored articles in the weekly paper Do Rzeczy, stating that LGBT rights movements are like Soviet–era communism.

The overall achieved score of achieved LGBTI human rights on Rainbow Europe from ILGA is at 13%.”

(6)
Let’s put the 13% figure into proper context as per the ILGA Europe report.
“For a fourth year in a row, Poland holds the worst record on LGBTQ+ rights in the EU behind Romania and Bulgaria, a report from rights organization ILGA–Europe released May 11, 2023 shows.
The report ranks European countries based on a review of laws and policies affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people. Each country is assigned a grade, ranging from 0 (gross violations of human rights) to 100 percent (full equality).”

(7)
Polish courts have also denied civil rights of pregnant women as per the European Court for Human Rights (ECHR) ruling.
“ECHR on Dec 14, 2023 ruled that a Polish constitutional court judgment that forced a woman to travel abroad to get an abortion violated her right to respect for private and family life.
The case was brought by a woman whose baby was diagnosed with a fetal anomaly while she was pregnant.
“The applicant had become pregnant, and the fetus was diagnosed with trisomy 21. A scheduled hospital abortion had been cancelled when the legislative amendments resulting from the constitutional court ruling had come into force,”
Unable to have an abortion in Poland, the woman ultimately had to travel to a private clinic outside of Poland for the procedure, the court added.
The human rights court said it found that the legislative amendments in question, which had forced the woman to travel abroad for an abortion at considerable expense and away from her family support network, had a significant psychological impact on her.
“Such interference with her rights, and in particular with a medical procedure for which she had qualified and which had already been put in motion, had created a situation which had deprived her of proper safeguards against arbitrariness,” the ruling said. “Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights was violated,” it added.”

(8)
Perhaps most fittingly – given that Pope John Paul II and Lech Walesa are my kind of contemporary Polish heroes – is the attitude of the PiS personalities exemplified in the outgoing Minister of Justice tweet and the National Council of the Judiciary (KRS) statement, which elicited, quoting “healthy ‘reactions’ to these unfounded allegations, such as the article by D. Sitnicka, entitled ‘Zbigniew Ziobro and the KRS attack the Court in Strasbourg for its judgment in the Wałęsa case. Are they right?’”, further quoting
“In a solid, well–reasoned judgment in the case of Wałęsa v. Poland, rendered on 23 November 2023, a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 of the ECHR (European Court of Human Rights), as regards Mr Wałęsa’s right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law and the principle of legal certainty, and of Article 8 of the Convention in that the right to respect his private life had been violated.
Furthermore, in applying its pilot–judgment procedure, the Court specified that Poland must take appropriate legislative measures to comply with Article 6 requirements, including the principle of the independence of the judiciary. ”

I would be more than happy to announce reconciliation if not resolution of the unfortunate legal saga, and to fully return to what I love doing most – creating actual value for actual people to help them realize their (financial and other) dreams,

Monica Kingsley

Defamation Appeals Court Verdict Statement (Oct 14, 2023)

No matter how much I esteem the ordinary Polish people and culture, my low expectations about Polish legal system’s ability to deliver justice, proved spot on.

I seek no further enemies, but allies in clearing a corner of rotten apples that are a stain on the image of Poland.
Big thanks to the only honorable actors in this saga – my very special, smashing Polish legal team.

Appeals Court continued the tradition of ignoring written evidence, Penal Code procedures including the Penal Code itself, defying common European values – by its verdict contradicting even the first instance verdict guidance.

This mockery of what is dignity as defined in Polish law, judicature and commitment to protect individual dignity as protected by international treaties and European Court of Human Rights, of humiliation incl. during the proceedings by the opposing party, of processing evidence, is nothing short of stunning and examination worthy.
If any of those esquired judges had to go through what I did, I‘m pretty sure they wouldn‘t acquit Mr Radomski.

Obviously though, this behavior that others beyond myself called defamation, harassment and extortion – this all flies in Polish courts, whether
– I file a criminal case for defamation,
– give testimony to Polish Police for harassment and extortion, or
– seek trial proceedings in the harassment and extortion matter I have also filed,
yet another Polish judge refused initiation of trial in this matter.

I can‘t and don‘t strive to hide my disgust over how justice in practice in Poland works.
I refuse to play this sick game anymore – I‘ll register a very narrow cassation complaint for violations of Polish law by courts of both instances in the defamation case – and I‘m not holding my breath.
Once available remedies are exhausted, I would have no other recourse left but to sue Poland in the European Court of Human Rights in Strassbourg for failure to comply with its own laws, and to protect my personal dignity.

This is not a mere personal rights infringement case – my personal dignity and honor (as defined in the Art. 212 §1 Penal Code), were not protected, and the wrongs ever since I left in 2020, never corrected.

If honor isn‘t freedom from incessant personal attacks on reputation – then I don‘t know what is.
If dignity isn‘t freedom from slanders and malicious insinuations – then I don‘t know what is.
If humiliation isn‘t dealt with to protect me from actions seeking to destroy ability to earn livelihood and subjugate me – then I don‘t know what‘s dignity and honor.
If harassment isn‘t disobeying clearly written request to be left alone – then I don‘t know what is.

If extortion isn‘t fielding unlawful demands to make you a financial slave for life – then I don‘t know what is.

Second instance verdict has the temerity not only not to reprimand witnesses lying under oath, but to contradict multiple written evidence, and claim that as a result of long campaign by Mr Radomski intimidating me, interfering with my civil rights and creating nuisance, but also to claim that my dignity was not harmed and that I did not lose confidence necessary to perform own professional activities, when the opposite is objectively true as I presented e.g. the following written evidence:

I remember that note Sunshine Profits published about you when you were just a blog. It looks to me to be a nasty reprisal for you terminating cooperation with them, and I must say it initially raised in me some question marks about you that I had to get over. Reading that biography made me unsure about the whole situation with you – about your integrity, professional qualifications and quality of your work. I had to get to know your analyses better to dispel the bad impression that Sunshine Profits text about you created,”

I consider the characterizations attributed to Ms Kingsley in the fake biography of Sunshine Profits that has absolutely no relation whatsoever to the real Monica Kingsley, the financial advisor for stock markets that most of us know in the last 3 years that I have been with her.
If I was somebody else and didn’t know her well in advance, I admit that following reading the fake bio published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, I would be confused and misled by the unacceptable characterizations thereby included and I need to seek other professional advisors who may have been much less competitive than Ms Monica Kingsley, thus endangering or even losing my fortune.
Thank you so much Monica for being real and not fake advisor…”

After many years of following several financial analysts and their published articles. I have encountered only once such an egregious defamatory act against a publishing analyst.
For different reasons analysts, like many other professionals, move on to other institutions or become independent. Reasons could be, but aren’t limited to, higher compensation, broader exposure in better-known institutions, flex time to be closer to family, or Internal conflicts within institutions.
In my opinion. Sunshine Profits has hurt and damaged Monica Kingsley’s honor and reputation by publishing publicly on their website that they are not affiliated with her anymore; going to great lengths to paint her in negative light and strongly inferring e.g., that she has no experience in managing capital and going to the extreme of “not supporting ” her webpage.
In the financial world, many publishing analysts abstain from investing and managing capital for clients as to not create a biased opinion of the public to sway price action in one direction or another.
Why would Sunshine Profits mention that Kingsley does not have experience managing capital of others? It is irrelevant to the nature of her market analyst and trader profession. Why would Sunshine Profits mention and make readers doubt her “integrity, skills and ethics”? It made me doubt (and probably made hundreds, even thousands of readers doubt, and still does) her professional integrity and skills.
I sincerely hope justice is served for Monica Kingsley. For many months I doubted her because of what Sunshine Profits published about her; but I finally concluded that the demeaning bio was published to harm her.”

Here’s how I see it. After reading the fake bio (that’s not how a typical professional bio or notice about two parties parting ways as of day-month-year, looks like) published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, I began to doubt her qualifications and ethics as a financial analyst, and had to become very cautious about her work. When she published the article “Why Sunshine Profits Is Irrelevant – To Us”, I gained a more clearer understanding of what caused Sunshine Profits to post such a note raising question marks about her qualities and reputation on their website. The arguments and written evidence quotes Monica Kingsley presented, appear to me to be a case of extortion and harassment by Sunshine Profits.”

yes, I’m aware of the “bio” that Sunshine Profits published about yourself. In my view, it conveys the impression of you being incompetent and unethical to the point that they had to fire you.
It doesn’t talk your analyses or achievements that they surely had been presenting online together with your proper bio before you made the decision to leave – this fake bio attacks and broadly undermines you as a person, as a market analyst.
It raises unjustified doubts, as if you couldn’t be a good analyst just because you were not managing money for others. Also by saying that they don’t confirm your ethics, integrity and skills, they’re directly undermining these qualities – it’s all very damaging to your professional reputation.
I had to overcome more of such doubts they raised, and for quite some time I had been watching your articles and tweets carefully, before I could start trusting you.”

Following reading the fake bio published about Monica Kingsley by Sunshine Profits, my initial reaction was what was going on with her? What had she done to deserve this unsettling disclaimer? Who had she harmed or what professional standards were breached. Should I look to subscribe elsewhere? The fake bio created an impression that she was unethical and unqualified for doing a good job as a market analyst. Thankfully I kept subscribing. Monika, you are the real deal and continue to provide the most informed market advise available. Thank you for not letting this slanderous attack detour you. You are the best.”

I’ll be brief and clear – f I had read the bio published by Sunshine Profits, before you offered me your commentary services, I would not have considered dealing with you. The picture they paint of you, would have been sufficient to warn me off. Since I found and accepted your services before reading the bio, I have found you to be insightful, and honest. The Sunshine bio does not describe the person I have come to know and respect”.

Poland – kindly prove that you‘re better than this – and that justice actually works for everyone at yours!
Why are you protecting someone who dares to send the following “legal registered letter” via his “law firm” that also openly misleads the Court of Appeals?

I guess that your actions created a much bigger threat for yourself than for me or my company.

I consulted this upcoming legal case (agreements, plus all the evidence we secured) with a second legal counsel, and they also told me I have north of 90% probability of winning it.

I have archives of practically everything that you have done online in the recent weeks and it all confirms claim that we’re making in the official document. I have archives of your hostile (they are hostile in the opinion of other people from the SP Team, both legal counsels’, and my own) messages.

This all means that either the court would issue a warrant of payment right away, or after a relatively short trial. With this warrant, I would go the bailiff (a.k.a. repossession agent), who would then freeze your bank & brokerage accounts, notify your landlord that all payments have to go toward the warrant and not to the landlord directly, and so on. We’re both in the EU, so this would be executed effectively (I checked). I’d present the court order to all third parties imaginable where it would be legal to do so (including news portals), who would then in all likelihood all stop publishing your analyses. Your “newsletter writer” career would be over, and you would have much bigger problem, because whatever company you would then work for, would also be notified by the bailiff and you’d not be able to earn much, if anything at all.

Knowing your emotional side, I’m afraid that this could – how to say it nicely – “negatively affect your willingness not only to pursue the newsletter writer path, but all other paths as well”.

You might be surprised by what I’m about to write.

I would require you to send us 30% of your gross (!) income (without tiers, linear scale). It’s “gross”, not “net”, because this means I won’t need to verify anything regarding your cost structure.

I’d require you to remove anything that’s Sunshine Profits’ related on your website / articles / comments etc. – that could be viewed as something negative (be that quote, comment or testimonial). I would allow you to use the profitability statistics – the chart from SP with logotype that confirms the validity of the data.

Additionally, I’d require you to include at least two backlinks to the dictionary / explanation section on our website(s) per week.

On my end, I would remove your bio from our page (which we have there legally – I triple checked), and I’d ask all portals to resume your publications.

Just a reminder nonetheless – we’re not negotiating. If you don’t want the agreement on these terms (I’m not open to negotiations, the above is the most that I’m willing to provide you with), and prefer to go the legal way, we can do so. In fact, I already paid for preparation of the court documents – but it doesn’t mean that I have to use them. Please send me a one-sentence email with how you’d like to proceed. Then, we’ll either sign a new revenue-sharing agreement (I’d send you the document with the above-mentioned details), or we’ll take this to court.”

(Reading from bottom up, here you can see my saga of breaking free from Sunshine Profits)

Poland, wake up please.
I call upon your best, upon your leaders and upon the international community
.
I seek individual justice.
I want to praise whoever kind helps me in correcting these painfully obvious wrongs.

Poland, to me you’re the country of Pope John Paul II and Lech Walesa legacy…
…bringing freedom to Central and Eastern Europe…
Poland, wake up please,

Monica Kingsley

Why Sunshine Profits Is Irrelevant – To Us (Jul 22, 2023)

What a journey, how much I have learnt about the world in only the last three years (2020-2023). Experiences that would finish off anyone not adaptive and sturdy to fight. This is as much tied to honesty, ethics, immutable values, and the overwhelming amount of manipulation, exploitation, deceit, disregard to what makes us human – all sadly what I had encountered frequently in the professional world.

I’m talking about the quest for justice, announced on Nov 12, 2021 – I mean the defamation lawsuit. First instance verdict has been announced, and while I had been predictably exonerated, I find it disturbing that so was the defendant. even though I established in court beyond rules of logic and life experience that:

– fake bio published served to demean me in public opinion, and did so
– fake bio contained numerous misrepresentations of reality, untruths
– my track record, analytics and market calls were never questioned
– I was repeatedly throughout 2018-2021 praised for my ethics, skills and achievements
– my real professional bio was removed after I could finally leave
– it was removed without any intention to bring my name ever back by the defendant
– fake bio was created and published days after my independent site went live
– fake bio sought to disparage me before professional audience and financial portals
– the defendant desperately sought to paint me in negative light at any cost
– the defendant undeniably undermined my honor, and is to this day seeking to humiliate me
– the defendant was unfoundedly spreading accusations of mine for unethical conduct
– the defendant was directing such unfounded accusations of contractual breaches to financial portals
– the defendant never registered his unfounded claims with any Court
– I was never interested in sending own analyses to Sunshine Profits
– I refused in writing to be ever contacted by the defendant, yet he repeatedly didn‘t heed that
– the defendant instituted publication limitations against myself

The defendant’s actions lasting for three years and counting, brought me into public disrepute, also seriously interfered with my site’s development, and led to actual loss of confidence necessary for my professional activities. In failing to condemn the demeaning and false allegations against myself, I unequivovally view that my personal dignity and honor (as defined in the Art. 212 §1 Penal Code), were not protected.

If honor isn‘t freedom from incessant personal attacks on reputation – then I don‘t know what is.
If dignity isn‘t freedom from slanders and malicious insinuations – then I don‘t know what is.
If humiliation isn‘t dealt with to protect me from actions seeking to destroy ability to earn livelihood and subjugate me – then I don‘t know what‘s dignity and honor.

This is not a mere personal rights infringement case. There is a tight line between freedom of speech, and prohibited ad personam attacks that sought to cripple me, limit my possibilities, and force me into financial servitude to the defendant’s benefit.

The whole legal saga clearly revealed whose testimony has been deemed unreliable and conflicting written evidence, the actual vs. professed standards of ethics, the true operating principles including towards paying subscribers. As I maintain, my experience with the defendant has been a nightmare, a place you just can’t leave without being pursued.

Is it a coincidence that I’m blacklisted at a number of key portals since declaring independence? No.
Is it a coincidence that no client ever criticized my professional ways or questioned my ethics? No.
Is it a coincidence that I terminated cooperation in Sep 2020, and not the other way round? No.
Is it a coincidence that I didn’t want to be connected with Sunshine Profits anyhow since Sep 2020? No.

Does it matter whether you prove lies and deal with ad hominem allegations? No.
Does it matter whether you refute every abstract statement and red herring? No.
Does it matter whether witnesses testify under oath in contradiction of written evidence? No.
Does it matter whether subscribers have been misled and harmed? No.
Does it matter whether demonstration of power inside the company came above client interests? No.
Does it matter whether management techniques involve humiliation? No.
Does it matter whether I was forced to return to authoring analyses under duress? No.
Does it matter whether my salary was cut without basis in law after I terminated cooperation? No.
Does it matter whether “misrepresentations of reality” about myself were and are being spread around? No.
Does it matter whether I was deprived of professional opportunities? No.
Does it matter whether my site growth was cut probably in half? No.

The only thing missing would be if I were offered financial assistance to make me withdraw the indictment before proceedings even started… Oh, wait – that’s a story for another day…

It does’t even matter that I requested in writing on Dec 2020 to be left alone, yet that I received this semianonymous letter in Mar 2021 inside an envelope marking the author as Przemyslaw Radomski sent from his law firm simultaneously with pre-trial demand for payment that was never pursued in any court. This “legal” letter authorship was accepted in the Court and wasn’t disputed by Przemyslaw Radomski – and as I have every right to publish incoming legal correspondence, I’m orderly quoting select parts of this letter seeking to take away my will to live and to push me into lifelong financial servitude.

Does this pass standards of legal correspondence, is this a representation of a non-harassing and non-extorting law abiding behavior and ethical standards fitting CFA charterholder conduct in your opinion?

I guess that your actions created a much bigger threat for yourself than for me or my company.

I consulted this upcoming legal case (agreements, plus all the evidence we secured) with a second legal counsel, and they also told me I have north of 90% probability of winning it.

I have archives of practically everything that you have done online in the recent weeks and it all confirms claim that we’re making in the official document. I have archives of your hostile (they are hostile in the opinion of other people from the SP Team, both legal counsels’, and my own) messages.

This all means that either the court would issue a warrant of payment right away, or after a relatively short trial. With this warrant, I would go the bailiff (a.k.a. reposession agent), who would then freeze your bank & brokerage accounts, notify your landlord that all payments have to go toward the warrant and not to the landlord directly, and so on. We’re both in the EU, so this would be executed effectively (I checked). I’d present the court order to all third parties imaginable where it would be legal to do so (including news portals), who would then in all likelihood all stop publishing your analyses. Your “newsletter writer” career would be over, and you would have much bigger problem, because whatever company you would then work for, would also be notified by the bailiff and you’d not be able to earn much, if anything at all.

Knowing your emotional side, I’m afraid that this could – how to say it nicely – “negatively affect your willingness not only to pursue the newsletter writer path, but all other paths as well”.

You might be surprised by what I’m about to write.

I would require you to send us 30% of your gross (!) income (without tiers, linear scale). It’s “gross”, not “net”, because this means I won’t need to verify anything regarding your cost structure.

I’d require you to remove anything that’s Sunshine Profits’ related on your website / articles / comments etc. – that could be viewed as something negative (be that quote, comment or testimonial). I would allow you to use the profitability statistics – the chart from SP with logotype that confirms the validity of the data.

Additionally, I’d require you to include at least two backlinks to the dictionary / explanation section on our website(s) per week.

On my end, I would remove your bio from our page (which we have there legally – I triple checked), and I’d ask all portals to resume your publications.

Just a reminder nonetheless – we’re not negotiating. If you don’t want the agreement on these terms (I’m not open to negotiations, the above is the most that I’m willing to provide you with), and prefer to go the legal way, we can do so. In fact, I already paid for preparation of the court documents – but it doesn’t mean that I have to use them. Please send me a one-sentence email with how you’d like to proceed. Then, we’ll either sign a new revenue-sharing agreement (I’d send you the document with the above-mentioned details), or we’ll take this to court.”

Stunningly, the Court doesn’t find this quasilegal correspondence with an “offer you can’t refuse” troubling.
No, it doesn’t matter that I request in writing at the end of “cooperation” not to be harassed – this “extrajudicial offer” and worse, flies in Court.
And did I get an even worse “offer” later on, in return for my willingness to reconcile? Makes you go, hmm.
Who on Earth can decide that the fake bio, unfounded accusations of unethical conduct, and publication limitations, all thrown in as bargaing chips with a particularly reprehensible motivaton, are not humiliating or undermining my dignity?

What to do when a slam dunk legal remedy fails to bring the desired outcome? Sure I can appeal the ruling – and I have done so. Sure there is the civil law (personal rights infringement) route to take. My excellent legal team at Gautier Law Firm always does a truly smashing job – that’s the only thing I can rely on. They are the ones honorable.

I wish I could say the same about the legal system experience, for I don’t believe justice can be reached by:

  • ignoring written evidence well beyond my non-business legal status until Jul 2022,
  • ignoring factual, evidenced circumstances culminating in my decision to exit with all the concurrent and subsequent misleading and not putting clients’ interests first,
  • parroting logically and factually deficient opponent’s arguments, and finally
  • employing cherry picking sophistry that results in mockery of the concepts of dignity and humiliation with denial of professional opportunities.

I’m protesting what must be considered as such a violation of Code of Criminal Procedure by the Court of first instance, and filing a practically obligatory appeal no matter how I have unfortunately experienced justice to work in practice. Perhaps the appeals Court would remedy that. If you ever see that my ability to comment on legal proceedings is ever being interfered with by any Court, I guess you know where this process of seeking justice is going…

Further, I’m notifying CFA Institute, sharing this quasilegal letter, and calling upon it to duly investigate for its own ethical standards compliance and to request all my written filings with ample actual evidence proving conscious sacrifice of client interests, which is the only proper route to evaluate whether “standards of subscriber care that doesn’t mislead, obfuscate or take advantage of” and “ethical conduct not bearing hallmarks of defamation / harassment / extortion resulting in undermining my honor and dignity” in line with its own ethical standards have been met by one of their charter holders, and to announce their findings publicly while respecting personal dignity and privacy of the parties involved.

I can change strategy and focus at any time.
I will not fall for any provocations.
I won’t write memoirs about “cooperation”.
I will not publish reciprocal bio, deluge of negative testimonials or disgraced professional records.
I will not quote colorful language of those who suffered immense financial losses over the years.
All through misplaced trust in stubborn sophistry refusing to recognize bullish PMs since 2018.
All through listening to siren songs of imminent crash if you just keep holding the fucking shorts.

Enough has been alreadu written publicly (and privately to myself by disgruntled Sunshine Profits clients) – e.g. at SiteJabber where Sunshine Profits as a company has a rating of 3 stars out of 5:

“PR” has a silver tongue. He has a most convincing way of writing. He really assures you He knows what he is doing and is giving you the most accurate advice. He uses no stops! He tells you if you want to use a stop make up your own? He will hold on to a losing position Forever with no stop. I did lose over $1 million listening to him. My fault. My choice. I’m over 21. For years now his only word for gold and silver is “short”. He is perpetually short the precious Metals. He is very convincing- until you look at your monthly account report.
November 2nd, 2021 – I lost over $1 million listening to radomski

PR provides a huge amount of information in his daily reports. However, my main reason for giving a low score is his unwillingness to take advantage of swings in price direction. Once he gets in a position he stays in the position. He loves to talk about how the market rhymes (and it does in a very subjective way), but if you follow his trading methodology you will miss making a lot of money when there are trend changes, often months long. I subscribed to his service for two and a half years and the profits were marginal when one considers the monthly cost is $200/mo, So far PR has made more money from me than I have made from the market. I have noticed that, in his daily reports, he will say that the trend change is imminent. Then after a week of continual upside the wording changes from “imminent” to “the next few weeks”, then “next few weeks to months”. All the while you miss out on the profit that is being lost as you sit there and watch what little profit you did have disappear as the price of gold just keeps rising and rising (this is assuming he is calling for a short position). He claims he is not a perma-bear. But I cannot see where this is true. Once he has decided the direction he sets up a position and stays in it regardless of any outside factors and then adjusts the commentary to explain why the current price movement is irrational and will turn soon. The turn is just around the corner, or maybe next week, or next month or by the end of whenever. As I write this, gold has gone from a low of $1,618 (11/3) to $1,869 (1/06/2023@ 11:10am). In all that time every report stated that the economic fundamentals, chart pattern rhyming, interest rate increases, the USDX is about to explode because the new month has arrived and that is when the dollar typically makes a reversal, the masses do not recognize the FED’s intent to continue raising interest rates in order to slow down inflation, etc etc etc. John Maynard Keynes said it best, “The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” is the main message I want to say here. I do not fault PR’s intentions, I do however, fault his ability to recognize the difference between a substantial change is price direction vs a pullback before resuming the trend. This simple thing will result in a significant loss of money, either directly or from missed opportunity. The recent change in direction I cited above is only one of many direction changes that PR said the risk of missing the resuming of the down trend was not worth trying to capitalize on the upswing. This is not just a one off. This happened time and time again. I don’t put all the blame on PR. I am a big boy and can make my own decisions. But I can’t tell you how many times I sat at my desk saying, “This is going higher, a lot higher”, all while his daily report states that market is not taking into account some technical aspect and the current uptrend is temporary and that the down trend will resume shortly; only to read a few days later that the down trend will resume over the next few weeks/months. The lost opportunity has been staggering. Even if all you did was VWAP or basic Fibonacci or whatever, the lost trades has been enormous.
In the end, I take responsibility for my trading. What I will say is that I had never traded the PM’s and was looking somewhere to go to learn how to trade this specific class of business. I did learn a lot from Sunshine Profits (now called Golden Meadow) regarding trading instruments and such. I believe I am much better equipped to trade the PM’s now. As they say 20/20 hindsight is always 100% accurate. But no doubt if I had used VWAP in conjunction with Fibonacci I would be miles and thousands of dollars better off than using the buy and hold methodology PR provides. To put it in perspective: from the August to Jan timeframe I mentioned earlier the GDXJ went from a low of $27.85 to $39.62 (as of 11:53 am). Anyone with a decent understanding of charts and patterns would have recognized, as I did, that the price action indicated a change in direction. All I can say is, “The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent” is very important. PR can give any number of reasons why the general masses are missing the big picture, or the forest for the trees as he likes to say. But in the end the irrational market is not irrational, it is simply the market. Traders MUST take this into account or you will suffer. I use his overall price points as goals, but I now trade the chart that is in front of me and do not hold on and hope the trend will return to the direction PR says it “should/will” go. I trade what is in front of me. If today (6 Jan 2023) provides a bearish candle indicating the direction has changed I will be short. However, there is nothing at the moment that says the downside is about to begin, nothing. That thinking only trains a person to try and catch the falling knife. As I heard Kenny Glick once say, “If you are above the VWAP in a short position or below the VWAP in a long position, you are on the wrong side of the trade. If that is the case, get out”. PR might very well be spot on with his long-term targets for gold and silver, I just cant take the hold on for dear life and hope he is right. My biggest problem as a trader has come from not taking profits along the way, taking too much risk given the risk/reward in relation to my account size and not being disciplined in using stops in order to limit my loss. PR simply establishes a position and then holds on. I can’t (no one should) trade that way. Unless of course you are using gambling money. PR opens every report with the phrase that the trade is “speculative”. I get that, but it should not mean risking it all. Trading is an art while employing solid time tested principles. Even my speculative trade positions have stops and target objectives along he during the trade cycle, I always take some money along the way. That way I never see a huge profit disappear or even go negative. This is the single greatest flaw in PR’s style of trading. He will let a giant win turn into a loss because he “knows/thinks/believes” the general market does not see what he sees. To which I say, “The markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” Buyer be ware.
Just my two cents.
Tom
Tip for consumers:
Not for beginners service
Products used:
stock charting service

Feb 06, 2023 – So much missed money.

Much charts, repeat prognosis, dangerous, no responses, we lost 100,000.00. Extreme dissapointment, promises never kept.
Update we have now lost 200,000.00 He advised short GDXJ for 4 months, guess what it went up over 11 points, you be the Judge. DONT listen to him. DONT give him one dime, Litigation pending.
Tip for consumers:
dont spend one dime
Products used:
Gold alerts
Nov 06, 2022 – PZEMYSLAW RADOMSKI OWNER OF SUNSHINE PROFITS -FRAUD –

If you prefer to listen to a guy who predicted $9 silver and $900 gold last year in april, and thus missing by 200% for silver and 100% for gold, be my guest… lol
May 10, 2021 – Jan Buyle

This guy is always pessimistic for gold. Never saw any positive comments on gold. Also, never saw his self-criticism on his wrong analysis and predictions. Don’t understand how he has been survived in this market. Please stop writing any more comments and analysis.
May 04, 2023 – Jaeyoo Kim

or this response I received from Dwain Hobbs on Feb 19, 2021:

You dont have to take what he writes seriously and respond to it too !,, theres a decade worth of the same nonsense copy/paste material in his history , just check it .

The most toxic places and people are best to be avoided.
Like a plague.
Those are soul destroyers.
Remaining and being treated like dirt?
Run away as fast as possible if you have self respect.
If you can’t change what’s wrong, go away.
Playing others’ games will only crush you.
No matter the price to leave, see where your freedom takes you.
And here I face the tough consequences that the verdict failed to remediate.

Let’s consider though the full picture – life as such. How far I advanced in the last three years.

I survived existential challenges that 99% never have to deal with.
The costliest and most damaging arrangement and dissociation.
I built up my site from scratch against all odds.
I continued serving you as faithfully as always.
I could spread my wings and fly.
I’m independent and don’t have to be licking anyone’s ass.
My first responsibility is towards you.
I’m free and I answer only to my conscience, God, and you.
I can tell every bastard and bitch exploiting me to fuck off.
I can be true to myself.
I can be genuine in everything I do.
My heart and mind are free.
I don’t even depend upon Earthly justice being reached.
I can care for you and serve you no matter what.
I can send everyone dishonest who meant me harm, to rot in Hell.
I don’t have to spend my time on Quijotic battles with the trash of this world.
I don’t have to care about that.
I don’t need them.
I don’t have to avenge the past legally.
I don’t need to expend more public arena efforts unless I’m forced to.
My Czech legal team is also ready if need be.
Contingency plans are in place to secure the world is in the picture no matter what.
No distractions by dogs barking at the caravan.
I can play by my own rules.
I can give my time and myself to whoever I choose to.
I can be with truly amazing people.
I can do what I love doing everyday.
I can change your world for the better.
I can serve you unrestricted.
I can live in the present.
I can look to the future.
I can live and love.

Fuck them, fuck them and let’s keep working – you come first.

Monica Kingsley

*** May 12, 2023 Legal Update ***

In the writ of payments case (#2 lawsuit on the homepage, scroll down), the final judgement of Apr 17, 2023 confirmed my claim as valid, and ordered that Sunshine Profits must pay me for unauthorized cuts to my salary (incl. legal costs) implemented after I decided to leave the “company” in Sep 2020 when clients were misled including about termination of cooperation, and I was prevented from serving their best interests duly.

Przemyslaw Radomski – Sunshine Profits respected the binding verdict only on May 11, 2023.

*** Sep 01, 2022 Legal Update ***

The mid Sep main hearing continuation with Oct follow up, approaches. After having delivered the bulk of my testimony about broad defamation activities against myself, I’ll move to address the defendant’s reflexive counterdefamation charge against me, which „rests“ on:

1) the defendant suddenly perceiving a reprint of one reader‘s metaphorical question as an insult – see here – even though I can‘t see therein any assessment of the defendant‘s qualities, and no portal raised objections publishing it together with my professional answer distancing myself from commenting on the personality of the defendant – see here. Link to the full article.

2) me issuing Nov 12 legal update – see here – whereby I announced intiation of legal proceedings against the defendant for acts committed against myself, negatively affecting the clients whose interests allegedly come first for the defendant, and the state of affairs which I evaluate as a nightmare that‘s beginning to end.

This is a blatant and ill-founded attempt to interfere with my freedom of speech that I view as clearly in violation of both the Constitution of Poland and the case law of European Court of Human Rights.

It is unacceptable that freedom of the press to report about initiation of legal proceedings including well evidenced factual circumstances, take legitimate questions about financial markets or express subjective statements, is even being questioned by the defendant towards whom I publicly expressed tremendous goodwill in May 2021.

I‘m deeply grateful to my legal team headed by my Guardian Angel, dr Adam Gautier, who I have the honor to know since the time of greatest need…

Whenever permitted by market action, I‘ll be writing briefer analyses till Sep 10, and also lightening up on Twitter activities outside my large following so as to prepare adequately with my legal team at Gautier Law Firm for this demanding event involving long travels. Let‘s get this over and done with! Looking forward for my return to serving you all the usual way on Sep 19!

Thanks again for all your support and understanding,

Monica Kingsley

*** Nov 12, 2021 Breaking Legal Update ***

#1 I’ve filed personal indictment for defamation against a certain individual (Article 212 § 1 and 2 of the Penal Code) with the II Criminal Division of the District Court in Sopot, Poland. As a private prosecutor, I’m asking that the Court acts on multiple disciplinary fronts.

#2 I’m seeking a writ of payment issuance by the V Commercial Division of District Court in Gdansk-North, Gdansk, Poland.

This is huge! Especially the extensive #1 filing would secure some redress for a long list of serious wrongdoings that have constituted illegal demands, misled and even hurt the audience, and provide me with enhanced peace of mind in looking solely to the future. It’ll take time, but I expect justice to be served – taking so long after I proudly made the great mid-Sep 2020 decision, and terminated cooperation. Dissociating as much and as fast as I realistically could from irreformable settings since late Sep 2020 already, but still delivering to the people as best I could in spite of imposed crippled means of service provision. Whoever was living off my success, repeatedly speaking about myself with high professional esteem, won’t be spreading insinuative slanders and sour grape allegations once the dollars I had been generating were slated to stop flowing their way through my decision to exit.

All in all, criminally brazen defamation, false rumors and coercion have no place in civilized society, and every abuse would be judged! Check all my public statements below if you aren’t familiar.

Thank you for all your loyalty, support, and the honor to serve you unrestricted!

Monica Kingsley

PS It’s Nov 17, 2021 today, and the pretrial meeting will take place in 3 weeks. Also, in 1 month and 1 week (on Dec 25, 2021), my no-compete clause elapses, allowing me to start pursuing business relations in the financial industry. I’m looking forward to open mindedly explore the wealth of opportunities while continuing writing for you the way I do now!!

PS #2 It’s Dec 26, 2021 today, and my no-compete clause has elapsed. I’m getting in touch with a wide gamut of select financial industry entities so as to explore and negotiate cooperation opportunities inside their organizations. During my deciding upon own future professional path, I’ll go on writing daily and intraday for you of course!!

PS #3 It’s May 19, 2022 today, and the key main hearing is approaching. Demanding event involving long travels – I won’t be able to provide any analyses or updates till May 29, 2022, unfortunately. I want to thank my legal team at Gautier Law Firm for great ongoing cooperation. Looking forward for my return to covering the markets!

PS #4 It’s Jul 01, 2022 today, and the key main hearing is to continue shortly. Demanding event involving long travels – I’ll be issuing only brief updates for the nearest 5 trading days. I won’t be able to provide any analyses, updates or many Twitter activities between Jul 11-15, 2022. Looking forward for my return to serving you on Jul 18, 2022!

PS #5 As per the Jul 08, 2022 News & Plans announcement (below), I’ve decided to start offering premium subscription services and 1:1 consulting – boutique financial offering eventually including asset management services, is the goal.
Thanks for subscribing and all your support!

PS #6 It’s Dec 29, 2022 today. As regards the lawsuit #2 – the Judge issued the writ of payment in Jan 2022, however the defendant objected in Mar 2022. The District Court in Gdansk-North, Poland however ruled in my favor in Sep 2022, ordering the defendant to pay. The defendant appealed to the Regional Court in Gdansk, Poland, which is now weighing whether to accept the appeal or not.
The proceedings of the lawsuit #1 (defamation) before the District Court in Sopot, Poland, are still ongoing – latest hearing adjourned due to inability to attend it within the defendant’s ranks. It’s well over 2 years ago since in connection with my decision to leave, Sunshine Profits unpublished my professional bio and profitable track record while I was in charge of Stock Trading Alerts.”

*** Jul 29, 2021 Breaking Update ***

My break’s major goal – concluding the optimistic peace initiative – looks seriously slipping away. I expect to come under attack through the bad faith legal case described in the mid-Mar update (red title) below – I’ll have to fight for survival in rebuffing any twisted & tortured allegations unequivocally, plus whatever follows. This is what it reminds me of.

Spending much time on legal is a matter of survival now – I won’t be able to provide extensive analyses every day. I’ll restart active trading calls and intermittent market coverage for subscribers and on Twitter. My future in the financial universe looks rosy – proxy measured through results of the continued honor to serve you, thank you so!!

Growing my professional reputation and reach this direct way furthers other scenarios to bring you more, beyond trading calls issuance & market analysis. See the portfolio performance! I would like to establish relations with hedge fund managers, financial media, commentators, brokers and other key players.

Many choices, but unless genuine, lasting peace inspired by my generous & ethical offers breaks out, I pledge to never do any business with Sunshine Profits – no matter any invitation to return.

Jul 08, 2021 Update from Monica Kingsley:

For personal reasons beyond my immediate control, I’ll be away from my site and Twitter for perhaps days, more probably weeks. I won’t open fresh positions, write daily reports or update my outlooks intraday – yesterday’s (Jul 07, 2021) email featured robust medium-term position details to survive my absence. Should I close any of the open positions in the meantime, I would let you know immediately. But I’ll continue to be for all practical reasons and purposes away.

Thank you for your understanding and loyalty – well worth the wait! I’m looking forward for seeing you asap again very much!!

May 2021 Update from Monica Kingsley :

While I had earlier written “I have never sought to be anyhow associated with Sunshine Profits since making the greatest liberating decision in Sep 2020. I neither endorse, nor recommend Sunshine Profits or its representative(s) to anyone. Ethics and personal integrity come foremost. I wish them well.”, I sincerely believe that genuine peace between myself and Mr. Radomski of Sunshine Profits is within reach and breaking out. Terrific!

*** Mar 15, 2021 UPDATE from Monica Kingsley ***

Friday Mar 12th, the adversary‘s threat of a legal challenge arrived. Assessing with my team the allegations of no-compete clause violation, personal rights infringement, copyright infringement and confidential information use, we have unequivocally found these as unfounded in full. It‘s a classic attempt to build a case in bad faith, and bully me into submission. No way in hell. If filed, their case has no prospects of being successful.

Instead of these very public fights where I am dealing them blow after blow in the market assessment and reports quality while being served underhanded retributions, I am disengaging from high intensity confrontation, stopping the legal actions I initiated wherever I can, and moderating my professional commenting. As we had been viewing the markets differently throughout 2020, we‘ll do so also in 2021, but the people are the arbiters of analytical relevance and trading success.

Taking care of our subscribers and readers is the only real way forward. Mutually bidding farewell to each other is in our best interests, which I am doing now. I am willing to deescalate further still, and should you see my meaningful reappearance at the portals blocking me, you would know that my offer of detente is taking hold.

My mission will forever be to serve my sharply growing audience in these risk-heavy and challenging markets, and it‘s these people already in and those still to come, where all my dedication, thoughts and care go towards,

Monica Kingsley

Mid Feb 2021 Update from Monica Kingsley:

I am under attack, but no longer fighting for my survival. This nightmare isn’t over, but I’m prevailing. A certain individual is spreading various false rumors, and putting illegal pressure on the few portals reembracing me. Silence, my reduced voice is sought – professional open forum exchange of ideas isn’t welcome. Amateurish attacks against my site were stopped dead in their tracks, making me smile as much as stubborn targets of $900 gold, $9 silver for years through April 2020 at least. Legal action against the perpetrator is underway on multiple fronts.

The rule of law wins over any lowly, desperate attack on myself, and real people are the ultimate judge of quality – not authors of notoriously off mark public calls, operating in the shadows. The flood of prior and new clients who have so far found me and (re)joined, casts a clear verdict on analytical relevance and trading success.Full compliance with no-compete clause here: I am a personal blog, not a business, and not getting a dime from anyone. Relying only on own intellect & life experience, flexibly interpreting charts & data my own unique ways. A few more portals cut me off regardless – victims of dark threats by the unscrupulous individual whose statements and actions don’t stand the test of truth or ethics.

This is an anticipated attack on my professional standing and freedom of expression by those whose endorsement I never even sought. Good riddance! Best decision of Sep 2020! Humble service to the people – the only grateful ones, rules! Don’t expect me to ever disappear. Please spread the word, demand my presence at your sites of choice, and also justice, especially if you can refer me to your seasoned U.S. lawyers.

See more right at the bottom of this page – Pressing Plea from Monica.

In gratitude yours,

Monica Kingsley

Pressing Plea from Monica Kingsley:

Jan 21, 2021

Dear Readers,

I’m finally back! Totally independent now thankfully, and as I can’t earn as a finance professional for 12 months, I will be providing you throughout 2021 with free daily extensive analyses and intraday trading updates whenever necessary. I’ll honored to help you out, just as I did to hundreds and thousands before already.

I need your help, please. I am starting from scratch, cut out from the many portals and all ability to talk with my prior era readers, I am relying on social media and on each one of you, to get the word out about who I am and what I do. Steadfast to my principles Texan style, with personal and professional boundaries and standards paramount, I have turned around to never look back.

People, please spread the knowledge of Monica Kingsley name so that I can bring profits to more of you – please request vocally that my content be featured at sites where you want to see it… Please request publicly that I be allowed to comment the way I welcome comments. This is key, whether you want to follow my trade ideas, or just read the analyses and to the point comments at your favorite place…

I want each of you to be really able to verify the quality of my work against what you’re getting currently.

In gratitude,

Monica Kingsley

Sign Up for Monica’s Insider Club!

It’s free and you’ll get my message right when a new post goes up.

Scroll to Top